Issues‎ > ‎vol1n1‎ > ‎

sdj-10015

The prevalence of fracture in acrylic removable dentures in Sulaimani city

 Cheman A. AL-Jmoor

College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17656/sdj.10015

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of fractures in Acrylic Removable Dentures in Sulaimani City.
Patients and methods: A questioner was used to collect the data from two dental laboratories. 264 fracture cases were collected.  The variables evaluated were; the fracture area, the possible cause of fracture, fracture frequency, place of denture construction, the age of the denture, and the type of Removable Denture, Partial or Complete Denture.

Results: The data result showed; The ratio of fracture incidence in complete denture to partial denture fracture was nearly 4:1, the ratio of upper to lower denture was 2:1, the most common fractures was midline fracture 112 (42.424%), followed by the De-Bonding of the artificial teeth 62 (23.484%). Dropping was the main possible cause of fracture 66 (25%), followed by poor occlusion 38 (14. 393%). 128 (48.484%) of the denture fractures was first time fracture, 136 (51.515%) of the dentures had repeated fracture. 112 (42.424%) of the fractured dentures were constructed by a technician like people (Dan Saz), 76 (28.787%) were constructed in dental hospital. 58 (21.969%) of the fractured dentures were constructed 1 years ago or less, 146 (55.303%) of the fractured dentures were more than 3 years old.      

Conclusion:
Midline fracture had the highest rate among all the other types of fractures; fracture of upper denture was more than lower dentures. Dropping followed by the De-bonding of the artificial teeth was the most possible cause of fracture. Fracture rate increased among the dentures which were first constructed by a technician like people (Dan Saz).  Fracture frequency increased as the denture age increased, also increased among dentures with repeated fracture.


Keywords: complete denture fracture, tooth de-bonding, midline fracture.

References

1.      Mack F, Schwahn C, Feine JS, et al. The impact of tooth loss on general health related to quality of life among elderly Pomeranians: results from the study of health in Pomerania (SHIP-O). Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18:414–9.

2.      Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials. 2002, 11th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; pp. 87-88.

3.      Smith DC: The acrylic denture: mechanical evaluation midline fracture. Br Dent J. 1961; 110:257-267.

4.      Hargreaves AS: The prevalence of fractured dentures. Br Dent J. 1969; 126:451-455.

5.      Darbar UR, Huggett R, Harrison A: Denture fracture—a survey. Br Dent J 1994;176: 342- 345.

6.      Ioannis Kostoulas, Victoria T. Kavoura, Mary J. Frangou, & Gregory L. Polyzois. Fracture Force,

Deflection, and Toughness of Acrylic Denture Repairs Involving Glass Fiber Reinforcement.  J of Prosthodontics.  17 (2008),  257– 261.

7.      Uzun G, Hersek N, Tincer T. Effect of five woven fiber reinforcements on the impact and transverse strength of a denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81: 616-20.

8.      Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81: 318-26.

   

9.      Vallittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappalainen R. Evaluation of damage to removable dentures in two cities in Finland.  Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51:363-369. Oslo. ISSN 0001-6357.

10.    Safwan F. Khasawneh, Jamal M. A Clinical study of complete denture fractures at four military hospitals in Jordan. JRMS. 2003; 10: 27-31.

11.    Amit Naik.  Complete denture fractures: A clinical study. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 01/2006.; 9 (3):148.

12.    Anthony E, Prombonas, Dimitris S Vlissidis. Comparison of the midline stress fields in maxillary and mandibular complete dentures. A pilot study.   J  Prosthet Dent.  2006; 95(1):63-70.

13.    Yunus N, Rashid AA, Azmi LL, Abu Hassan MI. Some flexural Properties of a nylon denture base polymer. J Oral Rehabil.  2005; 32:65-71.

14.    Prombonas A, Vlissidis D. Effects of the position of artificial teeth and load levels on the stress in the complete maxillary denture. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88:415-22.

15.    Carl F, Sand D, Masri RM. Single maxillary complete denture. DCNA 2004; 48, 567-84.

16.    Ruffino AR. Effect of stainless steel strengtheners on fracture resistance of the acrylic resin complete denture base. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 54: 75–8.

17.    Critchlow SB, Ellis JS, Prognostic indicators for conventional complete denture therapy: A review of the literature.  J Dent. 2010; 38:2-9.

18.    Pershaw PM, Walls AW, Jakubovics NS, Moynihan PJ, Jepson NJ, Loewy Z.  Association of removable partial denture use with oral and systemic health. J Dent. 2011; 39:711-9.

19.    Adeyemi AA, Lyons MF, Cameron DA.  The acrylic tooth denture base bond; effect of mechanical preparation and surface treatment.  Eur J Prosthet and Rest Dent. 2007; 15:108-14

20.    Anne Palitsch, Matthias Hannig, Paul Ferger, Markus Balkenhol.  Bonding of acrylic denture teeth to MMA/PMMA and light-curing denture base materials: The role of conditioning liquids.  J Dent. 2012: 210-221.

21.    G. Bayraktar, H.C. Bural, and S. Sarioglu.

Fractures and Tooth Debondings in Removable Dentures Needing  Repair. The Joint Meeting of the Continental European, Israeli and

Scandinavian (NOF).  (August 2004; 25-28).

22.    Beyli MS, Von Fraunhofer JA.  An analysis of causes of fracture of acrylic resin dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 46:238-241.

23.    Sudhir Kumar Arya.       Complete Denture

Prosthodontics.  1st. Edition. 2004. 

24.    Wiskott et al. 1995. Wiskott, H.W.A., Nicholls, J.I., Belser, U.C. Stress fatigue: basic principles and Prosthodontic implications. Int. J Prosthodontics. 1995 (8), 105.116.

25.    Johnston EP, Nicholls JI, Smith DE. Flexural fatigue of 10 commonly used denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 46:478-83.

26.    Beyli MS, Von Fraunhofer JA.  Repair of fractured acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent.  1980; 44:497-503.


Full Article - PDF