Issues‎ > ‎vol1n2‎ > ‎


A retrospective panoramic study for alveolar bone loss among young adults in Sulaimani City, Iraq

*Faraedon M. Zardawia, **Alaa N. Aboud & *Dler A. Khursheed

*College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani

**Department of Radiology, Shikh Omar Specialised Dental Center – Baghdad., Iraq.



Objective: to determine the prevalence of alveolar bone crest loss among a selected sample of archival orthopantomography (OPG) in relation to number of sites affected and gender in Sulaimani City.

Materials and methods:
A retrospective study was conducted with an inclusive period running from March to December 2007 to determine the prevalence of alveolar bone loss among 1072 subjects on panoramic radiographs. Panoramic images were sampled at the radiological archive of Dental School Hospital–University of Sulaimani for a selected age class ranged from 17 to 30 years. Bone loss was estimated by measuring the distance from cementoenamel junction (CEJ) minus 2 mm (physiologic high of interseptal alveolar crest) to the crest of the alveolar bone at sites with reduced normal level of interseptal bone. Total bone loss was divided into two groups according to number of sites affected; group one (1-3) sites showing bone loss per panoramic radiograph, and group 2 showing bone loss at more than 3 sites. Samples were also divided into two age groups; group one from 17 to 23 years and group two from 24 to 30 years. Moreover, bone loss was determined according to gender into male and female and number of sites affected for each gender. 

results showed that 347 images – 30.2% of the total images showed bone loss at one site or more. 14.6% of the images revealed bone loss at 1-3 sites, whereas, 15.6% demonstrated bone loss at more than 3 sites. Percentage of bone loss was significantly higher (P=0.001) among group two (24-30 years old group) than group one (17-23 years old group) 38% against 25% respectively. Female’s radiographs recorded a non-significantly higher (P>0.05) bone loss than male’s radiographs 31.7% against 28.7% respectively.   

prevalence of bone loss among young adults in Sulaimani City was relatively high compared to other published reports. There was a predilection for female. Bone loss was more prevalent at (24-30 years old group) compared to (17-23 years old group).

Full Article - PDF


1.    Messier MD, Emde K, Stern L, Radhakrishnan J, Vernocchi L, Cheng B, et al. Radiographic periodontal bone loss in chronic kidney disease. J Periodontol. 2012;83:602-11.

2.    Vijay G, Raghavan V. Radiology in periodontics. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2013;25:24-29.

3.    Salman A, Sabahat KA, Vikas D, Satish G. Radiology In periodontal disease diagnosis. IJOMHS. 2014;01:2-9.

4.    Lee JS, Kang BC. Screening panoramic radiographs in a group of patients visiting a health promotion center. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2005;35:199–202.

5.    Semenoff L, Semenoff TA, Pedro FL, Volpato ER, Machado MA,Borges AH, Semenoff-Segundo A. Are panoramic radiographs reliable to diagnose mild alveolar bone resorption? ISRN Dent. 2011;2011: 363578. 

6.    Osborne GE, Hemmings KW. A survey of disease changes observed on dental panoramic tomographs taken of patients attending a periodontology. Clinic. Br Dent J. 1992;173:166-8.

7.    Lennon MA, Davies RM: Prevalence and distribution of alveolar bone loss in a population of 15-year-old school children. J Clin Periodontol. 1974;1:175-82,.

8.    Albandar JM, Baghdady VS, Ghose LJ. Periodontal disease progression in teenagers with no preventive dental care provisions. J Clin Periodontol. 1991;18: 300-4.

9.    Hansen BF, Gjermo R Bergwitz-Larsen KR. Periodontal bone loss in 15-year-old Norwegians. J Clin Periodontol. 1984;11:125-31.

10.  Hansen BF, Gjermo P, Bellini HT, Ihanamaki K, Saxén L: Prevalence of radiographic alveolar bone loss in young adults, a multinational study. Int Dent J. 1995;45:54-61.

11.  Ivanauskaite D, Lindh C, Rangne K, Rohlin M. Comparison between ScanoraŅ panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue. Stomatologija. Baltic Dent Maxillofac J. 2006;8:9-15.

12.  Wiebe CB, Putnins EE: The periodontal disease classification system of the American Academy of Periodontology–an update. J Can Dent Assoc.


13.  Albandar JM, Tinoco EMB. Global epidemiology of periodontal disease in children and younge persons. Periodontol 2000. 2002;29:153-76.

14.  Chiles JL, Gores RJ. Anatomic interpretation of the orthopantomogram. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973;35:564-74.

15.  Lindhe J, Lang NP, Karring T. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry, 5th edition. UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.

16.  Cortelli JR, Cortelli SC, Jordan S, Haraszthy VI,

Zambon JJ. Prevalence of periodontal pathogens in Brazilians with aggressive or chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32:860-6. 

17.  van der Velden U, Abbas F, van Steenbergen TJM, De Zoete OJ, Hesse M, De Ruyter, et al. Prevalence of periodontal breakdown in adolescents and presence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in subjects with attachment loss. J Periodontol. 1989; 60:604-10.

18.  Høsrmand J, Frandsen A. Juvenile periodontitis localization of bone loss in relation to age, sex, and teeth. J Clin Periodontol. 1979;6:407-16.

19.  Susin C, Albandar JM. Aggressive periodontitis in an urban population in southern Brazil. J periodontol. 2005;76:468-75.

20.  Albandar JM, Muranga MB, Rams TE. Prevalence of aggressive periodontitis in school attendees in Uganda. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29:823-31.