Issues‎ > ‎vol2n1‎ > ‎

sdj-10038

The prevalence of lower alveolar flat ridge among completely edentulous patients in Sulaimani

Cheman A.  AL-Jmoor, Faten Khalid Ali Al-Kadi & Jwan F. Abdulkareem

College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17656/sdj.10038

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study is to investigate the prevalence of lower flat ridge among a sample of completely edentulous patients, and to correlate it with age, gender, the presence or absence of a previous denture and the period of complete edentulism.

Materials and Methods:
297 patients with lower flat ridge were included in the study. A questionnaire was used to record the data of each patient which include; the gender, the age of the patient, the presence or the absence of a previous denture, and the date of the last tooth extraction (the period of complete edentulism). The patients were informed that the recorded information was required for a research purpose, and it will be used in a survey, and their consents and agreements were taken verbally. All the collected data were checked and assessed by a prosthodontic specialist. The patients age were divided into four groups; (41-50 years), (51-60 years), (61-70 years), (more than 71 years). The period of complete edentulism were divided into two groups; (up to 5 years), and (more than 5 years). The data were correlated and descriptive statistic of tables, numbers and percentages along with Chi-Square, were used to analyze the data.

Results:
The results of the study showed that; 150 (50.505%) of the patients were males and 147 (49.494%) of the patients were females. The majority of the patients were from the age group (61-70) and (51-60) years in male and female respectively. No significant differences were found between gender and age group (P>0.05). The occurrence of the lower flat ridge was significantly higher in patients with previous dentures 184(61.952%) than those without dentures 113(38.047%) in both genders (P< 0.05). Finally, the results revealed that patients who were completely edentulous for up to five years had significantly higher numbers of lower flat ridge 178(59.932%) comparing to those who were completely edentulous for more than five years 119(40.067%).

Conclusions:
The presence of a previous denture, the longevity period of complete edentulism, the age, and the gender of the patient has an effect on the resorption of the lower residual ridge, and on the height of the lower residual ridge.

Keywords: lower residual ridge, previous complete denture, complete edentulism

References:


1.    Reich K, Huber C, Lippnig W, Ulm C, Watzek G, Tangl S. Atrophy of the residual alveolar ridge following tooth loss in an historical population. Oral Dis. 2011; 17(1): 33-44.

2.       Gruber H, Solar P and Ulm C. Maxillomandibular anatomy and patterns of resorption during atrophy.  In Watzek G, editor: Endosseous implants: scientific and clinical aspects. Chicago: Quintessence; 1993, p.29-62.  

3. Kovacic I, Celebic A, Zlataric D.K, Stipetic, J and Papic M. Influence of body mass index and the time of edentulousness on the residual alveolar ridge resorption in complete denture wearers. Coll Antropol. 2003;27 Suppl 2:69-74.

4.       Ellinger CW, Rayson JH, Terry JM and Rahn AO. Synopsis of complete denture. Philadelphia : Lea & Febiger; 1975, p.57-58. 

5.       Atwood DA and Coy WA. Clinical, cephalometric and densitometry study of reduction of residual ridges. Prosthet Dent 1971; 26: 280-295. 

6.       Atwood DA. Reduction of residual ridges in the partially edentulous patient. Dent Clin N Am 1973; 17: 747–754. 

7.       Zmysłowska E,  Ledzion S and Jędrzejewski K.  Factors affecting mandibular residual ridge resorption in edentulous patients: a preliminary report. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2007; 66(4):346-52.

8.       Włodarski K, Włodarski P, Brodzikowska A, Łuczak M,

9.       Carlsson GE. Clinical morbidity and sequelae of treatment with complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79:17-23. 

10.    Kribbs PJ. Comparison of mandibular bone in normal and osteoporotic women. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 218 - 222.  

11.     Nishimura I, Hosokawa R. & Atwood DA. The knifeedge tendency in the Mandibular residual ridges in women. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 820 - 826. 

12.     Kordatzis K, Wright PS and Meijer HJ. Posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption in patients with conventional dentures and implant over dentures.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;     18(3):447-52. 

13.     Devlin H and Ferguson.MW.  Alveolar ridge resorption and mandibular atrophy –a review of the role of local and systemic factors. Br Dent J 1991; 170: 101–104. 

14.     Xie Q, Na ̈ rhi TO, Nevalainen JM, Wolf J and Ainamo A. Oral status and prosthetic factors related to residual ridge resorption in elderly subjects. Acta Odontol Scand 1997; 55: 306–313. 

15.     Sennerby L, Carlsson GE, Bergman B and  Warfvinge J. Mandibular bone resorption 

16.     in patients treated with Tissue integrated prostheses and in complete denture-wearers. Acta Odontol Scand 1988; 46:135–140. 

17.     Denissen  HW,  Kalk  W,  Veldhuis  HA and van  Wass MA. Anatomic considerations for retentive  implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993; 8(2): 191-6.

18.     Al-Jabrah O. Association of type 2 diabetes mellitus with the reduction of mandibular residual ridge  among edentulous patients using panoramic radiographs. Open Journal of Stomatology. 2011; 1:61-8.