Issues‎ > ‎vol9no1‎ > ‎

sdj-10150

Effect of Adding Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles on Some Mechanical Properties of Dental Alginate
 
Hoshang k. Abdel-Rahman * , Ranj A. Omer ** , Mahabad M. Saleh * , Sazgar S. Al-Hawezi *** , Fahd S. Ikram *
 
*Prosthodontics Department, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.
**Department of dental technology, Gasha technical institute, Erbil, Iraq.
***Conservative Department, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.
 
Submitted: May 5, 2022, Accepted: May 27, 2022, Published: June 1, 2022.
 
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17656/sdj.10150

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2NPs) on Shore A hardness, Young’s modulus, and tear strength of alginate impression material. 

MethodsEach test consists of one control group (alginate without TiO2NPs), and three test groups (2%, 3%, and 5%) of TiO2NPs were added, respectively. For each group, seven samples were constructed. For Shore A hardness, the samples were prepared according to ISO standards (7619-1:2010); Young’s modulus was calculated from the obtained Shore A hardness value according to a special standard equation. In contrast, for tear strength, the samples were prepared according to ASTM D 624-00.      

ResultsThe Control group exhibited a significantly less Shore A hardness value than all the other groups except the group that contained 2% TiO2NPs, where the increase in the hardness value was non-significant. A similar result was observed for Young’s modulus test, where the addition of TiO2NPs significantly increased Young’s modulus compared to the control group. Although, on the contrary, the tear strength was significantly improved by adding 3% TiO2NPs compared to control and other groups, there was a significant drop in the value of tear strength when 5% TiO2NPs were added to alginate.  

ConclusionsThe addition of 3% TiO2NPs to dental alginate increased Shore A hardness, Young’s modulus, and significantly improved tear strength.                                                                                     


Keywords:  Alginate, Hardness, Nanoparticles, Tear strength, Young’s modulus.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

Full Article - PDF

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

References:
 
 
1. Imbery TA, Nehring J, Janus C, Moon PC. Accuracy and dimensional stability of extended- pour and conventional alginate impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(1):32-9.
2. Sakaguchi R, Ferracane J, Powers J. Craig’s Restorative dental materials. 14th ed. St. Louis Elsevier: Missouri; 2019. p 231.
3. Hamrun N, Rachman SA. Measuring sodium alginate content of brown algae species padina sp. as the basic matter for making dental impression material (irreversible hydrocolloid impression material). J Dentomaxillofac Sci. 2016;1(2):129- 33.
4. Coleman RM, Hembree JH, Weber FN. Dimensional stability of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. Am J Orthodont. 1979;75(4):438-46.
5. Mantena SR. Mohd I, Dev KP, Suresh Sajjan MC, Ramaraju AV, Bheemalingeswara Rao D. Disinfection of impression materials: a comprehensive review of disinfection methods. Int J Dent Mater. 2019;1(1):7-16.
6. Amalan A, Ginjupalli K, Upadhya N. Evaluation of properties of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials mixed with disinfectant liquids. Dent Res J. 2013;10(1):65-73.
7. Ginjupalli K, Shaw T, Tellapragada C, Alla R, Gupta L, Perampalli NU. Does the size matter? Evaluation of effect of incorporation of silver nanoparticles of varying particle size on the antimicrobial activity and properties of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. Dent Mater. 2018;34(7):158-65.
8. Abdel-Rahman HK, Al-Sammaraie SAS. Effect of adding magnesium oxide nanoparticles on the antimicrobial activity of a denture soft liner. Polytechnic J. 2020;10(2):132-7.
9. Nia AF, Ataei M, Zeighami H. A comparative study on the antimicrobial activity of irreversible hydrocolloid mixed with silver nanoparticles and chlorhexidine. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020;17(2):120-5.
10. Jafari A, Fard RMN, Shahabi S, Abbasi F, Shahedin GJ, Bakhtiari R. Optimization of antimicrobial efficiency of silver nanoparticles against three oral microorganisms in irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. Iran J. Microbiol. 2021;13(6):862-70.
11. Omidkhoda M, Hasanzadeh N, Soleimani F, Shafaee H. Antimicrobial and physical properties of alginate impression material incorporated with silver nanoparticles. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019;16(6):372-6.
12. Sun J, Forster AM, Johnson PM, Eidelman N, Quinn G, Schumacher G, et al. Improving performance of dental resins by adding titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Dent Mater. 2011;27(10):972-82.
13. Al-Hawezi SSQ. The effect of addition of titanium dioxide nanofillers on the properties of flowable composite resin (in vitro study). Ph.D.Thesis. 2021, Hawler Medical University. Iraq.
14. ISO 7619-1:2010. Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic-determination of indentation hardness- part 1: durometer method (Shore hardness).
15. Gent AN, On the relation between indentation hardness and young’s modulus, Rubber Chem Technol. 1958;31(4):896-906.
16. ASTM D 624-00 (2020). Standard test method for tear strength of conventional vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic elastomers.
17. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 12th ed. St. Louis. Missouri: Elsevier.2013. p 493-4.
18. King S, See H, Thomas G, Swain M, Determining the complex modulus of alginate irreversible hydrocolloid dental material. Dent Mater, 2008;24(11):1545-48.
19. Aziz T, Waters M, Jagger R. Analysis of the properties of silicone rubber maxillofacial prosthetic materials. J Dent. 2003;31(1):67-74.
20. Abdelrahman HK, Al-Sammaraie SAS. Effect of addition of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles on surface hardness and tensile bond strength of denture soft liner. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020;14(3):2479-85.
21. Ginjupalli K, Alla RK, Tellapragada C, Gupta L, Perampalli NU. Antimicrobial activity and properties of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials incorporated with silver nanoparticles. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(6):722-8.
22. Balkenhol M, Haunschild S, Erbe C, Wöstmann B. Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosth Dent. 2010;103(5):288-94.
23. Ikram FS. The effect of calcium carbonate nanofillers on some properties of room temperature vulcanized maxillofacial silicone elastomers. Ph.D. Thesis (2013), Hawler Medical University. Iraq. 












 
 
 
Creative Commons License © The Authors, published by University of Sulaimani, College of Dentistry