Patient Satisfaction after Lip Enhancement Procedure by Facial Fillers in Sulaimani City

Authors

  • Nawroz M. Kareem Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Author
  • Zanyar M. Amin Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17656/sdj.10169

Keywords:

Complications, Esthetic, Fillers, Satisfaction

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this paper is to assess the level of patient satisfaction after receiving lip filler injections. It also attempts to
investigate the association between the satisfaction level and various factors such as number of filler treatments, amount of filler
injected and site of injection, among female patients in Sulaimani.

Methods:
A cross-sectional survey that used a questionnaire derived from the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, WHO quality of
life scale and convenience sampling were used to recruit patients attending cosmetic clinics to the study. Besides, descriptive analysis
and chi-square methods were used to analyze the data.

Results:
300 female patients participated in the study, with a mean age of 28.48 years. About 90% of the participants reported
improvement after filler treatment, ranging from “improved” to “very much improved”. A statistically significant association was found
between patient satisfaction and number of filler treatments. Local side effects such as swelling and redness at the site of injection were common but they were mostly mild and did not last for an extended period.

Conclusions:
Although the satisfaction level is currently high, practitioners in the field need to pay more attention to this important
outcome, since understanding the patients’ motivation and expectations before proceeding with the procedure is very important and
can contribute significantly to increasing patient satisfaction with the results.

References

Waldman A, Maisel A, Weil A, Iyengar S, Sacotte

K, Llazaroff Jm, et al. Patients believe that

cosmetic procedures affect their quality of life: an

interview study of patient-reported motivations. J

Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(6):1671-81.

Molina B, David M, jain R, Amselem M, Ruiz-

rodriguez R, Ma my, et al. Patient satisfaction and

efficacy of full-facial rejuvenation using a

combination of botulinum toxin type a and

hyaluronic acid filler. Dermatol Surg.

;41:s325-s32.

Rzany B, Cartier H, Kestemont P, Trevidic P,

Sattler G, Kerrouche N, et al. Full‐face

rejuvenation using a range of hyaluronic acid

fillers: efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction

over 6 months. Dermatol Surg.

;38(7pt2):1153-61.

Fischer T, Sattler G, Gauglitz G. Lidocainhaltiger

hyaluronfiller auf cpm®-basis zur

lippenaugmentation. Der Hautarzt.

;67(6):472-8.

Alegre‐sánchez A, Bernárdez C. A new

nonhydrophilic agarose gel as subdermal filler for

facial rejuvenation: aesthetic results and patient

satisfaction.J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(8):1900-

Ali Mj, Ende K, Maas cs. Perioral rejuvenation and

lip augmentation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am.

;15(4):491-500.

Fernández-cossío S, Castaño-oreja Mt.

Biocompatibility of two novel dermal fillers:

histological evaluation of implants of a hyaluronic

acid filler and a polyacrylamide filler. Plast

Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(6):1789-96.

Liu Mh, Beynet dp, Gharavi nm. Overview of deep

dermal fillers. Facial Plast Surg. 2019;35(03):224-

Winslow Cp. The management of dermal filler

complications. Facial Plast Surg.

;25(02):124-8.

Moragas Jsm, Reddy Rr, Alfaro Fh, Mommaerts

my. Systematic review of “filling” procedures for

lip augmentation regarding types of material,

outcomes and complications.J Craniomaxillofac

Surg. 2015;43(6):883-906.

Lowe Nj, Maxwell Ca, Patnaik R. Adverse

reactions to dermal fillers. Dermatol Surg.

;31:1626-33.

De Almeida at, Carruthers J, Cox se, Goldman mp,

Wheeler S, Gallagher cj. Patient satisfaction and

safety with aesthetic onabotulinumtoxina after at

least 5 years: a retrospective cross-sectional

analysis of 4,402 glabellar treatments. Dermatol

Surg. 2015;41:s19-s28.

Maisel A, Waldman A, Furlan K, Weil A, Sacotte

K, Lazaroff jm, Et al. Self-reported patient

motivations for seeking cosmetic procedures. Jama

Dermatology. 2018;154(10):1167-74.

Bertucci V, Nikolis A, Solish N, Lane V, Hicks J.

Subject and partner satisfaction with lip and

perioral enhancement using flexible hyaluronic

acid fillers. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20(5):1499-

Geronemus rg, Bank De, Hardas B, Shamban A,

Weichman bm, Murphy dk. Safety and

effectiveness of vyc-15l, a hyaluronic acid filler for

lip and perioral enhancement: one-year results

from a randomized, controlled study. Dermatol

Surg. 2017;43(3):396-404.

Stojanovič L, Majdič N. Effectiveness and safety

of hyaluronic acid fillers used to enhance overall

lip fullness: a systematic review of clinical studies.

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(2):436-43.

Eccleston D, Murphy dk. Juvéderm® VolbellaTM

in the perioral area: a 12-month prospective,

multicenter, open-label study. Clin Cosmet Invest

Dermatol. 2012;5(1):167-72.

Hoffman L, Fabi S. Look Better, Feel Better, live

better? The impact of minimally invasive aesthetic

procedures on satisfaction with appearance and

psychosocial wellbeing. J Clin Aesthetic

Dermatol. 2022;15(5):47-58.

De Arruda Lhf, Rocha ft, rocha a. Studying the

satisfaction of patients on the outcome of an

aesthetic dermatological filler treatment. J Cosmet

Dermatol. 2008;7(4):246-50.

Published

2023-08-01

How to Cite

Patient Satisfaction after Lip Enhancement Procedure by Facial Fillers in Sulaimani City. (2023). Sulaimani Dental Journal, 10(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.17656/sdj.10169