The Relationship Between Crown Shape and Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary Second Molars in an Iraqi Sub-population Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)

Authors

  • Rawa O. Ibrahim Conservative Department, College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17656/sdj.10182

Keywords:

Crown shape, CBCT, Maxillary second molar, MB2, Root canal configuration

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to look into how crown shape affected the architecture of the root canals.


Methods: Nine hundred and fifty-four CBCT scans of maxillary second molars were evaluated. The relation between the crown shape
and sex, root number, and root canals was determined. The frequency of the second canal in the mesiobuccal root (MB2), its age
relation, and the symmetry of the concurrence of anatomical variations in contralateral molars were analyzed. The chi-square test was
used for the analysis of the outcomes. It was deemed significant at P< 0.05.


Results: Overall, rhomboidal-shaped crowns comprised 60.1% of all crowns, while heart-shaped crowns made up 39.9%. Three-rooted
teeth were the most common (74.5%), followed by two-rooted teeth (11.9%) and one-rooted teeth (8.5%), while four-rooted teeth made
up only 5% of all samples. The most prevalent result in terms of the canal number was three canals (67%), followed by four canals
(24.8%), two canals (7.3%), one canal (0.6%), and five canals (0.4%). Males were less likely to have crowns with a heart-shaped
structure than females. The rhomboidal crown (22%) had a higher occurrence of MB2 canals when compared to the heart-shaped crown (2.8%).


Conclusions: Given the constraints of this research, it would seem that the rhomboid form of the upper second molar crown is more
prevalent, with a greater tendency to have three and four roots and the presence of MB2 than the heart-shaped form.

References

Alfouzan K, Alfadley A, Alkadi L, Alhezam A,

Jamleh A. Detecting the Second Mesiobuccal

Canal in Maxillary Molars in a Saudi Arabian

Population: A Micro-CT Study. Scanning.

;2019:9568307.

Lee JH, Kim KD, Lee JK, Park W, Jeong JS, Lee

Y, et al. Mesiobuccal root canal anatomy of

Korean maxillary first and second molars by

cone-beam computed tomography. Oral

surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral

radiology, and endodontics. 2011;111(6):785-

Ahmad IA, Al-Jadaa A. Three root canals in the

mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars: case

reports and literature review. J Endod.

;40(12):2087-94.

Vizzotto MB, Da Silveira PF, Liedke GS, Arus

NA, Montagner F, Silveira HLD, et al.

Diagnostic reproducibility of the second

mesiobuccal canal by CBCT: influence of

potential factors. Oral Radiol.. 2015;31(3):160-

Dibaji F, Shariati R, Moghaddamzade B,

Mohammadian F, Sooratgar A, Kharazifard M.

Evaluation of the relationship between

buccolingual width of mesiobuccal root and root

canal morphology of maxillary first molars by

cone-beam computed tomography. Dent Res J.

;19(1):5.

Kim KR, Song JS, Kim S-O, Kim SH, Park W,

Son H-K. Morphological changes in the crown

of mandibular molars with an additional

distolingual root.Arch Oral Biol.

;58(3):248-53.

Aydın H. Relationship between crown and root

canal anatomy of four-rooted maxillary molar

teeth. Aust Endod J. 2021;47(2):298-306.

Ghamari M, Mollashahi NF, Salarpour M,

Mousavi E, Kazemian K, Moudi E, et al.

Evaluation of the relationship between crown

size and root canal morphology of mandibular

incisors by cone beam computed tomography

(CBCT). Electronic physician. 2017;9(8):5001-

GS R. Textbook of Dental Anatomy, Physiology

and Occlusion. second edition ed. Victoria

Street, London: Jaypee Brothers Medical

Publishers; 2014.

Nelson, Stanley J. Wheeler's Dental Anatomy,

Physiology and Occlusion: 1st SAE-E-book.

Elsevier Health Sciences, 2015.

Olczak K, Pawlicka H. The morphology of

maxillary first and second molars analyzed by

cone-beam computed tomography in a polish

population. BMC medical imaging.

;17(1):68.

Reis AG, Grazziotin-Soares R, Barletta FB,

Fontanella VR, Mahl CR. Second canal in

mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars is

correlated with root third and patient age: a

cone-beam computed tomographic study. J

Endod. 2013;39(5):588-92.

Wu D, Zhang G, Liang R, Zhou G, Wu Y, Sun

C, et al. Root and canal morphology of

maxillary second molars by cone-beam

computed tomography in a native Chinese

population. J Int Med Res. 2017;45(2):830-42.

Şımşek N, Keleş A, Bulut ET. Unusual Root

Canal Morphology of the Maxillary Second

Molar: A Case Report. Case Rep Dent.

;2013:138239.

Suresh M, Karthikeyan K, Mahalaxmi S.

Maxillary Second Molar with Fused Root and

Six Canals- A Case Report. J Clin Diagn Res.

;11(4):35-7.

Rosen E, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Beitlitum

I, Tsesis I. The diagnostic efficacy of cone-beam

computed tomography in endodontics: a

systematic review and analysis by a hierarchical

model of efficacy. J Endod. 2015;41(7):1008-

Zheng QH, Wang Y, Zhou XD, Wang Q, Zheng

GN, Huang DM. A cone-beam computed

tomography study of maxillary first permanent

molar root and canal morphology in a Chinese

population. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1480-4.

Rouhani A, Bagherpour A, Akbari M, Azizi M,

Nejat A, Naghavi N. Cone-beam computed

tomography evaluation of maxillary first and

second molars in Iranian population: a

morphological study. Iran Endod J.

;9(3):190-4.

Alamri HM, Mirza MB, Riyahi AM, Alharbi F,

Aljarbou F. Root canal morphology of maxillary

second molars in a Saudi sub-population: A

cone beam computed tomography study. Saudi

Dent J. 2020;32(5):250-4.

Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Ahuja R, Subbarao

CV, Gutmann JL. Cone-Beam Computed

Tomography Study of Root and Canal

Morphology of Maxillary First and Second

Molars in an Indian Population. J Endod.

;36(10):1622-7.

Abdalrahman K, Talabani R, Kazzaz S,

Babarasul D. Assessment of c-shaped canal

morphology in mandibular and maxillary

second molars in an iraqi subpopulation using

cone-beam computed tomography. Scanning.

;2022:4886993.

Ghasemi N, Rahimi S, Shahi S, Samiei M,

Frough Reyhani M, Ranjkesh B. A review on

root anatomy and canal configuration of the

maxillary second molars. Iran Endod J.

;12(1):1-9.

Betancourt P, Navarro P, Muñoz G, Fuentes R.

Prevalence and location of the secondary

mesiobuccal canal in 1,100 maxillary molars

using cone beam computed tomography. BMC

Medical Imaging. 2016;16(1):66.

Zhang Q, Chen H, Fan B, Fan W, Gutmann JL.

Root and root canal morphology in maxillary

second molar with fused root from a native

Chinese population. J Endod. 2014;40(6):871-5.

Lin YH, Lin HN, Chen CC, Chen MS.

Evaluation of the root and canal systems

of maxillary molars in Taiwanese patients:

A cone beam computed tomography study.

Biomed J. 2017;40(4):232-8.

Neaverth EJ, Kotler LM, Kaltenbach RF.

Clinical investigation (in vivo) of

endodontically treated maxillary first molars. J

Endod. 1987;13(10):506-12.

Ghobashy AM, Nagy MM, Bayoumi AA.

Evaluation of root and canal morphology of

maxillary permanent molars in an Egyptian

population by cone-beam computed

tomography. J Endod. 2017;43(7):1089-92.

Published

2024-04-01

How to Cite

The Relationship Between Crown Shape and Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary Second Molars in an Iraqi Sub-population Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). (2024). Sulaimani Dental Journal, 11(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.17656/sdj.10182