Evaluation of Dental Students’ Learning Skill Throughout Repeated Practicing in Recording Preliminary Impressions: An Experimental Study

Volume 12 , Issue 1 , April 2025 , Pages 35-42

Authors

Lazyan Raouf 1 ; Kawan Othman 1 ; Arivan M. Hama 1

1 Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Iraq.

DOI logo 10.17656/sdj.10203

Keywords

Abstract


Objective: This study aims to assess whether repeated attempts at taking alginate impressions improve the manual skills of dental students by measuring the error percentage of each preliminary impression and comparing these percentages across multiple trials to evaluate skill progression. 

Methods: Twenty dental students from the fifth-year stage were selected randomly to participate in the study. Each student took five alginate impressions after receiving a demonstration that included audio and video presentations to reinforce previously acquired knowledge. Error areas were highlighted using a red pen and then identified and quantified using Adobe Photoshop. Error areas have been deliberately identified to calculate the accuracy of each impression. The null hypothesis was that there would be no significant variation in the error percentages of preliminary impressions across the students' trials.

Results: The study's results revealed an improvement in the students' manual skills in taking impressions after repeated trials. Even though the fifth trial had the lowest median error percentage, the difference in group means was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Repeated impression-taking improves dental students' manual skills, lowering error percentages in subsequent trials. Furthermore, the use of digital technologies in dental education facilities breaks skill acquisition down into more straightforward steps to detect and correct the errors.

References


  1. Mongkolrattanasit W, Tanvarasethee V, Thangjantaraprapab K, Chuenjitwongsa S, Limpuangthip N. Identifying barriers and strategies for achieving competency in removable prosthodontics in undergraduate dental students: a mixed-method study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):123.
  2. Uoshima K, Akiba N, Nagasawa M. Technical skill training and assessment in dental education. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2021;57:160-3.
  3. Hawezy DJ, Barzinjy ST, Saadadin G, Hawezy GA, Baqer W. Perception of undergraduate medical students and examiners towards grand objective structured clinical examination. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1392.
  4. Saeed HM, Faraj BM, Saeed KM, Hamagharib DS, Talabani RM, Khursheed DA. Quality of root canal fillings performed by undergraduate dental students in the school of dentistry, University of Sulaimani. J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(9):105-9.
  5. Alauddin MS, Baharuddin AS, Mohd Ghazali MI. The Modern and Digital Transformation of Oral Health Care: A Mini Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(2):118.
  6. Mangano Guest Editor F. Digital Dentistry: The Revolution has Begun. Open Dent J. 2018;12:59-60.
  7. Drancourt N, Auduc C, Mouget A, Mouminoux J, Auroy P, Veyrune JL, et al. Accuracy of conventional and digital impressions for full-arch implant-supported prostheses: an in vitro study. J Pers Med. 2023;13(5):832.
  8. Parameshwari G, Chittaranjan B, Sudhir N, Anulekha-Avinash CK, Taruna M, Ramureddy M. Evaluation of accuracy of various impression techniques and impression materials in recording multiple implants placed unilaterally in a partially edentulous mandible- An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(4):e388-e95.
  9. Bajoghli F, Sabouhi M, Nosouhian S, Davoudi A, Behnamnia Z. Comparing the accuracy of three different impression materials in making duplicate dies. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(7):12-6.
  10. Nandini VV, Venkatesh KV, Nair KC. Alginate impressions: A practical perspective. J Conserv Dent. 2008;11(1):37-41.
  11. Desai V, Bumb D. Digital dental photography: a contemporary revolution. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;6(3):193-6.
  12. Bowen AC, Burns K, Tong SY, Andrews RM, Liddle R, O'Meara IM, et al. Standardising and assessing digital images for use in clinical trials: a practical, reproducible method that blinds the assessor to treatment allocation. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e110395.
  13. Favaretto M, Shaw D, De Clercq E, Joda T, Elger BS. Big data and digitalization in dentistry: a systematic review of the ethical issues. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7):2495.
  14. Palis AG, Quiros PA. Adult learning principles and presentation pearls. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014;21(2):114-22.
  15. Khalil R, Mansour AE, Fadda WA, Almisnid K, Aldamegh M, Al-Nafeesah A, et al. The sudden transition to synchronized online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study exploring medical students' perspectives. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):285.
  16. Waddell G, Perkins R, Williamon A. Making an impression: Error location and repertoire features affect performance quality rating processes. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2018;36(1):60-76.
  17. Acar YB, Abuhan E, Boyacıyan R, Özdemir F. Influence of facial type on attractiveness of vertical canine position from the perspective of orthodontists and laypeople. Angle Orthod. 2022;92(2):233-9.
  18. Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa J. Dental impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2017;61(4):779-96.
  19. Zhao J, Wang X. Dental prostheses. Advanced ceramics for dentistry: Elsevier; 2014. p. 23-49.
  20. Ammar M, Al-Thani NJ, Ahmad Z. Role of pedagogical approaches in fostering innovation among K-12 students in STEM education. Soc Sci Human Open. 2024;9:100839.
  21. White C, Bradley E, Martindale J, Roy P, Patel K, Yoon M, et al. Why are medical students 'checking out' of active learning in a new curriculum? Med Educ. 2014;48(3):315-24.
  22. Taylor BP. Teaching ESL: incorporating a communicative, student‐centered component. Tesol Quarterly. 1983;17(1):69-88.
  23. Leite WL, Svinicki M, Shi Y. Attempted Validation of the Scores of the VARK: Learning Styles Inventory With Multitrait–Multimethod Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2010;70(2):323-39.
  24. Qu G, Hu W, Jiao W, Jin J. Application of Deep Learning-Based Integrated Trial-Error + Science, Technology, Reading/Writing, Engineer, Arts, Mathematics Teaching Mode in College Entrepreneurship Education. Front Psychol. 2021;12:739362.
  25. Wang K. Optimized ensemble deep learning for predictive analysis of student achievement. PLoS One. 2024;19(8):e0309141.
  26. Eberspächer H, Immenroth M. [Mental training--does it also help the modern surgeon?]. Zentralbl Chir. 1999;124(10):895-901.
  27. Toth AJ, McNeill E, Hayes K, Moran AP, Campbell M. Does mental practice still enhance performance? A 24 Year follow-up and meta-analytic replication and extension. Psychology of sport and exercise. 2020;48:101672.
  28. Souiki T, Benzagmout M, Alami B, Ibn Majdoub K, Toughrai I, Mazaz K, et al. Impact of mental imagery on enhancing surgical skills learning in novice's surgeons: a pilot study. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):545.
  29. Schwibbe A, Kothe C, Hampe W, Konradt U. Acquisition of dental skills in preclinical technique courses: influence of spatial and manual abilities. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016;21(4):841-57.
  30. Suddick RP, Yancey JM, Wilson S. Mirror-tracing and Embedded Figures tests as predictors of dental students' performance. J Dent Educ. 1983;47(3):149-54.
  31. Landers DM. The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of sport psychology. 1983;5(1):25.
  32. Sanders CW, Sadoski M, Bramson R, Wiprud R, Van Walsum K. Comparing the effects of physical practice and mental imagery rehearsal on learning basic surgical skills by medical students. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(5):1811-4.
  33. Allami N, Paulignan Y, Brovelli A, Boussaoud D. Visuo-motor learning with combination of different rates of motor imagery and physical practice. Exp Brain Res. 2008;184(1):105-13.
  34. Giuliani M, Lajolo C, Clemente L, Querqui A, Viotti R, Boari A, et al. Is manual dexterity essential in the selection of dental students? Br Dent J. 2007;203(3):149-55.
  35. Lugassy D, Levanon Y, Shpack N, Levartovsky S, Pilo R, Brosh T. An interventional study for improving the manual dexterity of dentistry students. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0211639.
  36. El-Kishawi M, Khalaf K, Winning T. How to improve fine motor skill learning in dentistry. Int J Dent. 2021;2021:6674213.
  37. Neves TDC, Pazos JM, Genaro LE, Hallak JC, Garcia P. Manual dexterity in dentistry: Development and evaluation of a preclinical training program. J Dent Educ. 2023;87(9):1242-9.
  38. Collin V, O'Selmo E, Whitehead P. Stress, psychological distress, burnout and perfectionism in UK dental students. Br Dent J. 2020;229(9):605-14.
Statistics
  • Article view1140
  • Downloads19
  • Published at1 April 2025

  • RIS
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • APA (7th edition)
  • MLA (9th edition)
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • Vancouver