The Effects of Different Attachment Geometries on Second Molar Uprighting in Clear Aligner Treatment: An In Vitro Study

Volume 12 , Issue 3 , December 2025 , Pages 31-41

Authors

Hawre Maarouf 1 ; Trefa M. Ali Mahmood 1

1 Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Iraq.

DOI logo 10.17656/sdj.10214

Keywords

Abstract

Objective: Investigate the biomechanical impacts of various attachment designs on second molar uprighting, identify optimal geometry, and provide clinical guidelines for clear aligner treatment following first molar loss.

Methods: This in vitro study was conducted by using 3D-printed dental models with mesially tilted second molars. Five groups were designed based on attachment geometry: one without attachment, horizontal, inclined attachment, twin alternative, and two vertical. Clear aligners were fabricated and applied to each model to deliver uprighting forces. Pre- and post-treatment tooth positions were measured to a fixed reference point by using CBCT, and changes in mesiodistal inclination, buccolingual inclination, vertical, and mesiodistal distances were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by pairwise comparisons to identify significant differences among groups.

Results: The inclined attachment produced the greatest uprighting effect in mesiodistal inclination, indicating superior molar control compared to other geometries. Minimal buccolingual inclination change was observed in the single horizontal and inclined groups, while twin-type attachments showed greater deviation. Vertical positioning was largely maintained across groups, with no statistically significant differences. Mesiodistal distance varied between attachment types, with inclined and horizontal designs showing the greatest reduction. Overall, attachment geometry demonstrated measurable effects on molar movement across multiple dimensions.

Conclusions: The inclined attachment showed better performance in second molar uprighting compared with single horizontal, twin, and two vertical attachments. Attachment geometry significantly influences molar control.

References

  1. AlMogbel A. Clear Aligner Therapy: Up to date review article. J Orthod Sci. 2023;12(1):37.
  2. Rouzi M, Zhang X, Jiang Q, Long H, Lai W, Li X. Impact of clear aligners on oral health and oral microbiome during orthodontic treatment. Int Dent J. 2023;73(5):603-11.
  3. Ozmen B. Evaluation of permanent first molar tooth loss in young population from North Turkey. Balk J Dent Med. 2019;23(3):20-3.
  4. Rao MH, Aluru SC, Jayam C, Bandlapalli A, Patel N. Molar incisor hypomineralization. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17(7):609-13.
  5. Schneider PM, Silva M. Endemic molar incisor hypomineralization: a pandemic problem that requires monitoring by the entire health care community. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018;16(3):283-8.
  6. Shibasaki WMM, Martins RP. Loads of continuous mechanics for uprighting the second molar on the second molar and premolar. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;161(5):679-86.
  7. Saber AM, Altoukhi DH, Horaib MF, El-Housseiny AA, Alamoudi NM, Sabbagh HJ. Consequences of early extraction of compromised first permanent molar: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):59.
  8. Mahmood TMA. Occlusal plane steepness and profile change following tad-based one-step retraction on four-unit extraction cases: a retrospective study. Diagnostics. 2023;13(14):2395.
  9. Magkavali-Trikka P, Emmanouilidis G, Papadopoulos MA. Mandibular molar uprighting using orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review. Prog Orthod. 2018;19(1):1.
  10. Bisht S, Khera AK, Raghav P. White spot lesions during orthodontic clear aligner therapy: A scoping review. J Orthod Sci. 2022;11:9.
  11. Nucera R, Dolci C, Bellocchio AM, Costa S, Barbera S, Rustico L, et al. Effects of composite attachments on orthodontic clear aligners therapy: a systematic review. Materials. 2022;15(2):533.
  12. Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL. Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(5):881-9.
  13. Yuan X, Liu L, Fan Q, Zhou H, Wang Y, Lai W, et al. Uprighting and protraction of two unilateral mandibular molars using a cantilever arm through a sophisticated biomechanical system with clear aligner: A case report. Int Orthod. 2024;22(3):100893.
  14. Ho C-T, Huang Y-T, Chao C-W, Huang T-H, Kao C-T. Effects of different aligner materials and attachments on orthodontic behavior. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(3):1001-9.
  15. Rashid ZJ, Chawshli OF. Is bracket position determination from digital techniques accurate 100%?: A comparative ex-vitro study. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2020;7(1):4384-94.
  16. AlKahlan LA, Bindayel NA, Mallek AM, Bendjaballah MZ. Extensive iterative finite element analysis of molar uprighting with the introduction of a novel method for estimating clinical treatment time. Appl Sci. 2025;15(12):6463.
  17. Fareed AlSammraaie M, A Fatalla A. The effect of ZrO2 nanoparticles addition on Candida adherence and tensile strength of 3D printed denture base resin. J Nanostructures. 2023;13(2):544-52.
  18. Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod. 1972;62(3):296-309.
  19. Nanda R, Castroflorio T, Garino F, Ojima K. Principles and biomechanics of aligner treatment. 1st ed. Elsevier; 2021.
  20. Mampieri G, Giancotti A. Invisalign technique in the treatment of adults with pre-restorative concerns. Prog Orthod. 2013;14(1):40.
  21. Jedliński M, Mazur M, Greco M, Belfus J, Grocholewicz K, Janiszewska-Olszowska J. Attachments for the orthodontic aligner treatment—state of the art—a comprehensive systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(5):4481.
  22. Kirby S, Pesun I, Nowakowski A, França R. Effect of different post-curing methods on the degree of conversion of 3D-printed resin for models in dentistry. Polymers. 2024;16(4):549.
  23. Cowley DP, Mah J, O’Toole B. The effect of gingival-margin design on the retention of thermoformed aligners. J Clin Orthod JCO. 2012;46(11):697-702.
  24. Hassan MS, Abdelsayed FA, Abdelghany AH, Morse Z, Aboulfotouh MH. For indirect orthodontic attachment placement, adding a custom composite resin base is not beneficial: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Int J Dent. 2022;2022(1):9059697.
  25. Sultanoğlu E, Gürel HG, Gülyurt M. The effects of different attachment types and positions on rotation movement in clear aligner treatments: a finite element analysis. Cureus. 2024;16(8):1-11.
Statistics
  • Article view1018
  • Downloads26
  • First online1 December 2025
  • Published at1 December 2025

  • RIS
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • APA (7th edition)
  • MLA (9th edition)
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • Vancouver