Incorporation of Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles in 3D-Printed Acrylic Resin: Impact on Mechanical and Physical Properties: An In Vitro Study

Volume 12 , Issue 3 , December 2025 , Pages 10-20

Authors

chawan Qader 1 ; Neda Al-Kaisy 1

1 Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Iraq.

DOI logo 10.17656/sdj.10212

Keywords

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of incorporating bioactive glass (BAG) nanoparticles at varying concentrations on the mechanical and physical properties of 3D-printed denture base resin. Specifically, flexural strength, surface roughness, and surface hardness.

Methods: Six groups of 3D-printed acrylic resin specimens were studied: one control group (0% BAG) and five experimental groups containing 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, and 3% BAG nanoparticles by weight. Flexural strength, surface hardness, and roughness testing were done on 10 specimens. All were digitally planned and 3D printed using SprintRay. XRD, FTIR-ATR, and FESEM were used to characterise the sample. Mechanical testing includes three-point bending for flexural strength, Shore D durometers for surface hardness, and portable roughness testers for surface roughness.

Results: Flexural strength did not differ significantly among groups (ANOVA, p = 0.527), with mean values ranging from 130.6 ± 2.4 MPa (control) to 135.5 ± 2.0 MPa (3% BAG). Surface hardness showed significant improvements at 1.5% (89.9 ± 1.2) and 2% (89.9 ± 1.2) compared with the control (88.2 ± 1.6; p = 0.028 and p = 0.020, respectively). Surface roughness decreased progressively with BAG addition, and the 3% group (0.063 ± 0.017 μm) was significantly smoother than both the control (0.134 ± 0.090 μm; p = 0.01) and the 1% group (0.125 ± 0.101 μm; p = 0.014).

Conclusions: Incorporating up to 3% BAG nanoparticles into 3D-printed denture base resin can improve surface properties without compromising flexural strength. The concentration between 1.5% and 3% significantly increased the surface hardness and roughness. These advancements imply that BAG-modified resins have the potential to provide advantages such as enhanced clinical longevity and ease of use for prosthetic devices that are manufactured using 3D technology.

References

  1. Rezaie F, Dahri M, Farshbaf M, Masjedi M, Maleki R, Amini F. 3D printing of dental prostheses: Current and emerging applications. J Compos Sci. 2023;7(2):80.
  2. Ataei K, Ghaffari T, Moslehifard E, Dizaj SM. Physico-chemical and mechanical assessments of a new 3D printed PMMA-based acrylic denture base material. Open Dent J. 2024;18(1):1-6.
  3. Karni PA, Maheshwari S, Sarada V, Dass SS, Ananda MN. 3D printing in dentistry: revolutionizing customization and delivery of dental prosthetics. J Neonatal Surg. 2025;14(4):473-8.
  4. Dimitrova M, Corsalini M, Kazakova R, Vlahova A, Chuchulska B, Barile G, et al. Comparison between conventional PMMA and 3D printed resins for denture bases: A narrative review. J Compos Sci. 2022;6(3):87.
  5. Qadir GO, Abdulkareem JF. An in vitro comparative study of maxillary denture base retention between conventional fabrication and 3D printed techniques. Sulaimani Dent J. 2023;10(2):45-53.
  6. Alhotan A, Yates J, Zidan S, Haider J, Silikas N. Flexural strength and hardness of filler-reinforced PMMA targeted for denture base application. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(10):2659.
  7. Al-Douri ME, Sadoon MM. Flexural strength, hardness and surface roughness of 3D printed denture base resin reinforced by zinc oxide nanoparticles. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2023;11(1):194-200.
  8. Sodagar A, Bahador A, Khalil S, Shahroudi AS, Kassaee MZ. The effect of TiO₂ and SiO₂ nanoparticles on flexural strength of poly (methyl methacrylate) acrylic resins. J Prosthodont Res. 2013;57(1):15-9.
  9. Altarazi AT, Jadaan L, McBain AJ, Haider J, Kushnerev E, Yates J. 3D-Printed nanocomposite denture base resin: The effect of incorporating TiO₂ nanoparticles on the growth of Candida albicans. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;130(2):283-9.
  10. Altarazi AT, Haider J, Alhotan A, Silikas N, Devlin H. 3D printed denture base material: The effect of incorporating TiO₂ nanoparticles and artificial ageing on the physical and mechanical properties. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023;39(10):1122-36.
  11. Majeed HF, Hamad TI, Bairam LR. Enhancing 3D-printed denture base resins: A review of material innovations. Sci Prog. 2024;107(3):368504241263484.
  12. Aati S, Akram Z, Ngo HC, Fawzy AS. Development of a 3D-printed denture-base resin reinforced with silver/zinc oxide mesoporous nanoparticles: mechanical, biological and antibiofilm properties. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022;134:105418.
  13. Alhotan A, Raszewski Z, Chojnacka K, Mikulewicz M, Kulbacka J, Alaqeely R, et al. Evaluating the translucency, surface roughness, and cytotoxicity of a PMMA acrylic denture base reinforced with bioactive glasses. J Funct Biomater. 2024;15(1):16.
  14. Jones JR. Review of bioactive glass: From Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(1):4457-86.
  15. González P, Serra J, Liste S, Chiussi S. Raman spectroscopic study of bioactive silica based glasses. J Non Cryst Solids. 2003;320(1–3):92-9.
  16. Misra SK, Mohn D, Brunner TJ, Stark WJ, Philip SE, Roy I. Comparison of nanoscale and microscale bioactive glass on the properties of P(3HB)/Bioglass® composites. Biomaterials. 2008;29(12):1750-61.
  17. Liu S, Gong W, Dong Y, Hu Q, Chen X, Gao X. The effect of submicron bioactive glass particles on in vitro osteogenesis. RSC Adv. 2015;5(49):38830-6.
  18. Al-Eesaa NA, Johal A, Hill RG, Wong FS. Fluoride-containing bioactive glass composite for orthodontic adhesives: apatite formation properties. Dent Mater. 2018;34(8):1127-33.
  19. Raszewski Z, Chojnacka K, Kulbacka J, Mikulewicz M. Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of 3D printing acrylic material with bioactive components. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14(1):13.
  20. Raszewski Z, Chojnacka K, Mikulewicz M. Preparation and characterization of acrylic resins with bioactive glasses. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):16624.
  21. Raszewski Z, Nowakowska D, Wieckiewicz W, Nowakowska A. Release and recharge of fluoride ions from acrylic resin modified with bioactive glass. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(7):1054.
  22. Raszewski Z, Chojnacka K, Mikulewicz M, Alhotan A. Bioactive glass-enhanced resins: A new denture base material. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(12):4363.
  23. Prpić V, Schauperl Z, Ćatić A, Dulčić N, Čimić S. Comparison of mechanical properties of 3D-printed, CAD/CAM, and conventional denture base resins. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(6):524-8.
  24. Raouf L, Faraj S, Azhdar B. Evaluation of flexural strength of heat cure PMMA denture base material reinforced with various concentrations of zirconium oxide. Sulaimani Dent J. 2019;6(2):22-30.
  25. Rashid AAL. Some properties of 3D printed acrylic resin material modified by antifungal Vitis vinifera oil. Dent 3000. 2025;1:a001.
  26. Gaviria-Martinez A, Castro-Ramirez L, Ladera-Castañeda M, Cervantes-Ganoza L, Cachay-Criado H, Alvino-Vales M, et al. Surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:258.
  27. Sasaki Y, Nishizawa Y, Watanabe T, Kureha T, Uenishi K, Nakazono K, et al. Nanoparticle-based tough polymers with crack-propagation resistance. Langmuir. 2023;39(26):9262-72.
  28. McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied Dental Materials. 9th ed. Chichester (UK): John Wiley and Sons; 2013.
  29. Sun L, Gibson RF, Gordaninejad F, Suhr J. Energy absorption capability of nanocomposites: A review. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69(14):2392-409.
  30. Asopa V, Suresh S, Khandelwal M, Sharma A, Saimbi CS, Mathur S. A comparative evaluation of properties of zirconia reinforced high-impact acrylic resin with that of high-impact acrylic resin. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(3):ZC16-9.
  31. Rahman MM, Khan KH, Parvez MMH, Irizarry N, Uddin MN. Polymer nanocomposites with optimized nanoparticle dispersion and enhanced functionalities for industrial applications. Processes. 2025;13(4):994.
  32. Jayasoman S, Perera DJ, Kodagoda K. Effect of silica nanoparticles on flexural strength and surface hardness of heat polymerized acrylic resin. Bangladesh J Med Sci. 2024;23(10):S79-86.
  33. Vojdani M, Bagheri R, Khaledi AAR. Effects of aluminum oxide addition on the flexural strength, surface hardness, and roughness of heat-polymerized acrylic resin. J Dent Sci. 2012;7(3):238-44.
  34. Kurzendorfer-Brose L, Rosentritt M. The effect of manufacturing factors on the material properties and adhesion of Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans on additive denture base material. Materials (Basel). 2025;18(6):1234.
Statistics
  • Article view835
  • Downloads22
  • First online1 December 2025
  • Published at1 December 2025

  • RIS
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • APA (7th edition)
  • MLA (9th edition)
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • Vancouver