Comparison of the gingival phenotype in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects among patients suffering from periodontal diseases

Volume 13 , Issue 1 , April 2026 , Pages 40-50

Authors

Aram Hamad 1 ; Aram Hamad 1

1 University of Sulaimani

DOI logo 10.17656/sdj.10220

Keywords

Abstract


Objective: This study aimed to compare the gingival phenotype (GP) in subjects with periodontal disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with that in subjects without diabetes mellitus.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed involving 182 subjects with periodontal diseases (102 with type 2 DM, 80 without DM), aged 40 to 65 years. Clinical parameters were assessed, including keratinized gingival width (KGW) and gingival thickness (GT), plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI), probing depth (PD), and clinical attachment loss (CAL).

Results: Diabetic patients displayed significantly higher KGW (5.58 ± 0.90 mm vs. 5.12 ± 0.58 mm, p = 0.006), PI (41.19 ± 19.71% vs. 28.38 ± 13.53%, p = 0.001), and BI (42.49 ± 18.16% vs. 28.19 ± 13.80%, p = 0.0001) in comparison to non-DM individuals. There were no significant differences in GT, PD, and CAL between the groups. Sex-based comparisons indicated no significant differences between any of the examined parameters. Correlation analysis and chi-square testing demonstrated substantial relationships between PI and BI (p = 0.0001), BI and CAL (p = 0.04), and PD with CAL (p = 0.0001).

Conclusions: Diabetes significantly alters the GP by increasing KGW, plaque, and bleeding indices, whereas other clinical parameters, such as GT, PD, and CAL, remain predominantly unchanged. These findings underscore the importance of managing inflammation and closely monitoring treatment outcomes in individuals with diabetes with periodontal disease.

پوختە


ئامانجەکان: ئامانجی ئەم توێژینەوەیە بەراوورد کردنی فینۆ تایپی پووک لەو کەسانەی کە نەخۆشی پووک و دەوروبەری ددانیان هەیە لە جۆری دووەمی شەکرە و ئەوانەی شەکرەیان نییە.

ڕێگاکان: توێژینەوەیەکی پانەبڕگەیی لە سەر 182 کەسی تووشبوو بە نەخۆشییەکانی پووک و دەوروبەریی ددان ئەنجامدرا (١٠٢ کەس لە جۆری دووەمی شەکرە، ٨٠ کەس بەبێ شەکرە)، تەمەنیان لە ٤٠ بۆ ٦٥ ساڵ بوو. پارامیتەرە کلینیکیەکان هەڵسەنگاندنیان بۆ ئەنجامدرا کە بریتی بوون لە:

keratinized gingival width (KGW) and gingival thickness (GT), plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI), probing depth (PD), and clinical attachment loss (CAL).

ئەنجامەکان: نەخۆشانی شەکرە کەنەخۆشی پووک و دەوروبەری ددانیان هەیە بە شێوەیەکی بەرچاو پارامیتەرەکانی

KGW (5.58 ± 0.90 mm vs. 5.12 ± 0.58 mm, p = 0.006), PI (41.19 ± 19.71% vs. 28.38 ± 13.53%, p = 0.001), and BI (42.49 ± 18.16% vs. 28.19 ± 13.80%, p = 0.0001)  

بەرز ترە بە بەراورد لەگەڵ کەسانی کە نەخۆشی شەکرەیان نیە.جیاوازییەکی بەرچاو لە پارامیتەرەکانی (GT, PD, CAL) نێوان گروپەکاندا نەبوو. بەراوردکارییەکانی بنەمای ڕەگەز ئاماژەیان بە هیچ جیاوازییەکی بەرچاو لە نێوان هیچ کام لە پارامیتەرە پشکنینکراوەکاندا نەکرد. شیکاری پەیوەندی و تاقیکردنەوەی کای-سکوێر پەیوەندییەکی بەرچاوی نیشان دا لە نێوان:

PIو BI (p = 0.0001), BI و CAL (p = 0.04), و PD لەگەڵ CAL (p = 0.0001).   

دەرەئەنجامەکان: شەکرە بە شێوەیەکی بەرچاو فینۆتایپی پووک دەگۆڕێت بە زیادکردنی پارامیتەرەکانی (KG, Plaque Index, Bleeding index) ، پێوەرەکانی تر وەکو( GT, PD, CAL) بە زۆری وەک خۆیان دەمێننەوە، ئەم دۆزینەوانە جەخت لەسەر گرنگی چارەسەرکردنی هەوکردنی پووک و چاودێریکردنی وردی دەرئەنجامەکانی چارەسەرکردن دەکاتەوە لە و کەسانەی کە هەردوو نەخۆشی شەکرەو پووکیان هەیە.  

References


  1. Kinane DF, Stathopoulou PG, Papapanou PN. Periodontal diseases. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3(1):1-14.
  2. Zardawi F, Gul S, Abdulkareem A, Sha A and Yates J. Association between periodontal disease and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: revisited. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021; 7:625579.
  3. Preshaw PM, Alba AL, Herrera D, Jepsen S, Konstantinidis A, Makrilakis K, et al. Periodontitis and diabetes: a two-way relationship. Diabetologia. 2012; 55(1):21-31.
  4. Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, Bissada NF, Bouchard P, Cortellini P, et al. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri‐implant diseases and conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45: S219-S229.
  5. De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 2009: 36(5):428-33.
  6. Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Smith DH. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010;30 (3)237-43.
  7. Fu JH, Yeh CY, Chan HL, Tatarakis N, Leong DJ, Wang HL. Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology. J Periodontol. 2010;81(4):569-74.
  8. Wennström J, Lindhe J. Role of attached gingiva for maintenance of periodontal health: healing following excisional and grafting procedures in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 1983;10(2):206-21.
  9. Kim DM, Bassir SH, Nguyen TT. Effect of gingival phenotype on the maintenance of periodontal health: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J. Periodontol. 2020;91(3):311-38.
  10. Lee SP, Kim TI, Kim HK, Shon WJ, Park YS. Discriminant analysis for the thin periodontal biotype based on the data acquired from three‐dimensional virtual models of Korean young adults. J Periodontol. 2013;84(11):1638-45.
  11. Bednarz W. The thickness of periodontal soft tissue ultrasonic examination—current possibilities and perspectives. Dent Med Probl. 2011;48(3):303-10.
  12. Fu JH, Lee A, Wang HL. Influence of tissue biotype on implant esthetics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(3):499-508.
  13. Tofiq RK, Hamad AM. Assessment of Gingival Phenotype in Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Sulaimani City. Sulaimani Dent J. 2023;10 (1):11-19.
  14. Lalla E, Papapanou PN. Diabetes mellitus and periodontitis: a tale of two common interrelated diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;7(12):738-748.
  15. Polak D, Shapira L. An update on the evidence for pathogenic mechanisms that may link periodontitis and diabetes. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(2):150-66.
  16. Pashova-Tasseva Z, Mlachkova A, Tosheva E. Impact of gingival phenotype on the periodontal disease. Folia Med. 2023;65(3):468-75.
  17. Moosa Y, Samaranayake L, Pisarnturakit PP. The gingival phenotypes and related clinical periodontal parameters in a cohort of Pakistani young adults. Heliyon. 2024;10(2):e24219.
  18. Alasiri MM, Almalki A, Alotaibi S, Alshehri A, Alkhuraiji AA, Thomas JT. Association between gingival phenotype and periodontal disease severity-a comparative longitudinal study among patients undergoing fixed orthodontic therapy and Invisalign treatment. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(6):656.
  19. Nagate RR, Chaturvedi S, Al-Ahmari MMM, Al-Qarni MA, Gokhale ST, Ahmed AR, et al. Importance of periodontal phenotype in periodontics and restorative dentistry: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1-10.
  20. Tonetti MS, Greenwell H, Kornman KS. Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. J Periodontol. 2018;89(12):S159-S72.
  21. Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J. 1975;25(4):229-25.
  22. Lang NP, Löe H. The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health. J Periodontol. 1972;43(10):623-27.
  23. Kloukos D, Koukos G, Doulis I, Sculean A, Stavropoulos A, Katsaros C. Gingival thickness assessment at the mandibular incisors with four methods: a cross‐sectional study. J Periodontol. 2018; 89(11):1300-09.
  24. Bland JM, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307-310.
  25. Mealey BL, Oates TW. Diabetes mellitus and periodontal diseases. J Periodontol. 2006;77(8):1289-303.
  26. Botero JE, Yepes FL, Roldan N, Castrillon CA, Hincapie JP, Ochoa SP, et al. Tooth and periodontal clinical attachment loss are associated with hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes. J Periodontol. 2012;83(10):1245-50.
  27. Păunică I, Giurgiu M, Dumitriu AS, Păunică S, Pantea Stoian AM, Martu M.A, et al. The bidirectional relationship between periodontal disease and diabetes mellitus—a review. Diagn. 2023;13(4):681.
  28. Zhang Z, Ji C, Wang D, Wang M, Song D, Xu X, Zhang D. The burden of diabetes on the soft tissue seal surrounding the dental implants. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1136973.
  29. Yildirim Bolat S, Lutfioglu M. Evaluation of gingival phenotype: the role of gingival thickness measurements from different vertical gingival levels. Clin Oral Investig. 2025;29(1):87.
  30. Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Di Gianfilippo R, Shedden K, Oh TJ, Rasperini G. et al. Soft tissue phenotype modification predicts gingival margin long‐term (10‐year) stability: longitudinal analysis of six randomized clinical trials. J Clin Periodontol. 2022;49(7):672-83.
  31. Abdulkareem AA, Al-Taweel FB, Al-Sharqi AJB, Gul SS, Sha A, Chapple ILC. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of periodontitis: from symbiosis to dysbiosis. J Oral Microbiol. 2023;15(1):2197779.
  32. Chen J, Wang H, Bu S, Cheng X, Hu X, Shen M, Zhuang H. Alterations in subgingival microbiome and advanced glycation end-products levels in periodontitis with and without type 1 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1344.
  33. Ebersole JL, Kirakodu SS, Zhang XD, Dawson III D, Miller CS. Salivary features of periodontitis and gingivitis in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):30649.
  34. Gregorczyk-Maga I, Kania M, Dąbrowska M, Samborowska E, Żeber-Lubecka N, Kulecka M, Klupa T. The interplay between the gingival crevicular fluid microbiome and metabolomic profile in intensively treated people with type 1 diabetes, combined metagenomic/metabolomic approach, cross-sectional study. Front Endocrinol. 2024;14:1332406.
  35. Xiang Dd, Sun Yx, Jiao C, Guo Yq, Fei Yx, Ren Bq, et al. Diabetes and periodontitis: the role of a high-glucose microenvironment in periodontal tissue cells and corresponding therapeutic strategies. Stem cell res ther. 2025;16(1),366.
  36. Sanz M, Ceriello A, Buysschaert M, Chapple I, Demmer RT, Graziani F, et al. Scientific evidence on the links between periodontal diseases and diabetes: Consensus report and guidelines of the joint workshop on periodontal diseases and diabetes by the International Diabetes Federation and the European Federation of Periodontology. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;137:231-41.
Statistics
  • Article view585
  • Downloads7
  • First online1 April 2026
  • Published at1 April 2026

  • RIS
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • APA (7th edition)
  • MLA (9th edition)
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • Vancouver